While comparing these convertors I found that some of my more “problematic” RAWs that I struggled with in LR could be better developed in either the manufacturer’s own RAW s/w (especially Olympus and Canon) or in Affinity Photo. Unfortunately, I haven’t yet found anything that will be a straightforward replacement for the overall functionality of LR but I’m still hoping… I hope you like the video & image and have a greatĪ few months back I tried out quite a few of the alternatives to Lightroom and discovered that many of my RAW files develop better in convertors other than Adobe’s. I processed the converted RAW file using a combination of Nik Color Efex, Nik Viveza and Luminosity Masks created with Lumenzia in Photoshop. I didn’t use any filters for the capture as the camera could just about cope with the dynamic range of the scene. Had I tilted it the image the mountain wouldn’t have I was also careful toĪvoid distorting the mountain with the super wide lens by keeping the back of Loom large, I crouched down low and in close to the pool. Larger than it is because I had the lens set to 11mm. Pool of water you see in the foreground was really very small. I used the Fuji X-T2 with a Fuji 10-24mm lens handheld. Had it been a heavy snowfall I doubt I would have thought I was lucky.
I was fortunate enough for my trip to coincide with a light snowfall. I captured this week’s Friday Image in Scotland last week on the famous and Rannoch Moor. So, before you rush out to change that camera or lens thatĭoesn’t quite perform, try using a few different RAW converters. The best RAW converter changed with the RAW file.Īlthough I didn’t highlight it in the video, this difference is down to the lens.The difference between the best and worst of theįour RAW converters tested is significant.There are two interesting points to come out of this: It shows the results from four RAW converters, processing two Fuji X-T2 RAW files. This week I published this video on YouTube. Don’t fall into this trap.Ī couple of weeks back I demonstrated this using RAW files from a Sony RX10 and RX100. With certain camera/lens combinations can fool you into thinking the lens orĬamera is at fault. To handle some lenses better than others.
It’s not just the camera that seems to be a factor. RAW converter that excels with one camera can perform poorly with another. The Best RAW Converter Depends on Your CameraĪs I investigate this further, what I’m finding is that a There’s nothing surprising there, except it’s not necessarily one converter Image quality produced by different RAW converters. I’m seeing more and more that there’s a large variation in If the image quality from your camera and/or lens isĭisappointing you, don’t rush to change it. This week I feel the urge to highlight something to the
0 kommentar(er)
